Contingent doesn’t mean unlikely. It means undated.

A revenue guarantee, a termination clause, a compensation claim: the State signs them as if they were remote, and leaves them out of the payment schedule. Then traffic falls short, a court rules, a contract fails — and the contingent becomes a line in next year’s budget.

This week: revenue guarantees one country pays every year. Claims that tripled in five years, one of them now a court order. A fragile State capping its guarantees before its first PPP. A parliament voting the payments before the road is signed. And the research: a government guarantee triples the hazard of contract distress.

Week of 2 November 20263 November 20265 cases · 7 slides
Türkiye · the guarantee that always pays

The risk was transferred. The guarantee is paid every year.

Türkiye has signed 277 PPPs since 1996, worth 6.7% of GDP in contract value. Their risks and rewards, the IMF’s fiscal transparency update notes, are transferred to project companies outside government. Except one: minimum revenue guarantees, which “are frequently called, particularly for the transport sector”.

0.2%
of GDP in demand-guarantee payments expected in 2026 — a contingent liability paid like a budget line

There is no cap on total PPP exposure. Annual payments over the life of the contracts are not published, and guarantee exposure is not disclosed by sector or project. The IMF rates PPP disclosure “Basic, unchanged from 2015”.

Source · Türkiye · IMF, Fiscal Transparency Evaluation Update, TA Report No. 2026/087, published 23 Oct 2026, ¶¶87–88
Portugal · when a claim becomes a court order

€2.9 billion of claims the budget doesn’t price. One just became a bill.

Portugal’s parliamentary budget office counts €2,869m of contingent liabilities from PPPs at end-2025: rebalancing, compensation and indemnity claims by private partners. It is the highest since the series began — €891m in 2020. The fiscal council notes the 2027 budget does not factor in the outcome of the negotiations under way.

€285.6m
court-ordered indemnity on the Algarve Litoral road subconcession, booked in the 2027 budget — 0.1% of GDP

The budget office is careful: these are claims, not recognised charges. But their realisation, “in whole or in part, would weigh on the budget balance of future years”. One already has.

Source · Portugal · UTAO, Relatório 18/2026, 30 Oct 2026 · CFP, Relatório 08/2026, 26 Oct 2026
Somalia · the ceiling comes first

Cap the guarantees before you sign the first PPP.

Somalia is leaving debt relief behind and beginning to finance infrastructure “through debt and guarantees”. In the medium term it plans to issue guarantees or enter into PPPs to upgrade key infrastructure. Before signing any of them, its 2026 budget sets a limit.

0.5%
of GDP: the ceiling on demand guarantees in the 2026 budget — set before the first contract, not after the first call

The World Bank’s Public Finance Review spells out why: these guarantees and PPPs “could generate significant fiscal costs if revenues or demand fall short and the guarantee is called”.

Source · Somalia · World Bank, Somalia Public Finance Review 2026 (P512884), disclosed 25 Oct 2026, ch. 1
Czechia · the firm commitment, voted

Parliament votes the payments before the road is signed.

On 26 October the Czech government approved the D35 motorway PPP: two new sections built, financed, operated and maintained by a private consortium. The State starts paying for availability only once every new section is open — and pays less when the road falls short of the contract.

CZK 71.3bn
net present value of the availability payments — which the Chamber of Deputies must approve before signature

Under the road act, the Chamber must consent to “the figures expressing the State’s financial obligations to the concessionaire” before the contract is signed. The commitment is firm, and it is counted where it is decided.

Source · Czechia · Ministry of Transport, press release on the D35 PPP, 26 Oct 2026
Global · the clause that predicts the trouble

A government guarantee triples the hazard of contract distress.

The guarantee is often what gets a PPP signed. An IMF economist’s study of PPP contracts in developing economies finds it also predicts the trouble: when the government issues a guarantee, the hazard of contract distress — disputes, renegotiation, cancellation — “increases by a factor of 3”.

×3
the hazard of distress for a guaranteed PPP contract — worst where public investment management is weakest

The earlier IMF working paper, on about 6,000 contracts in 113 emerging and developing economies (1984–2015), pointed the same way. The risk is “most pronounced in developing countries at the bottom quintile of public investment management capacity”.

Source · Nose (2025), Oxford Economic Papers 77(3): 806–828 · IMF Working Paper WP/17/243 (2017)
The through-line

A contingent liability is a payment nobody has dated. Date it.

Türkiye pays its revenue guarantees every year. Portugal’s claims became a court order. Somalia capped its guarantees before the first contract; Czechia puts the payments to a vote before signature. And across developing economies, the guarantee is the clause that predicts distress. Contingent liabilities arrive. The only choice is whether the budget expected them.

VfMvalue for money
Cost every guarantee on the State’s own traffic study, not the bidder’s.
FAROPPP fiscal risk
Register guarantees and open claims with an expected call and a tail, under a published ceiling.
GFSaccrual accounting
Move a guarantee into the budget the year it starts being paid — and say so.

Which of your guarantees is already being paid?

Papers, models & FARO

Every fix above points at a paper in the Austral series, and at the instrument that implements it.

ResearchPlatform